Open App
EN

Who writes this, and what it is worth.

This is a partner site. It is not run by TurboLoop, it earns a commission when someone registers through its link, and it publishes the things that commission would prefer it did not.

What this site is

One pillar page and the pages under it, covering a single protocol: what its plans pay, how the mechanics work, what can be verified on chain and what cannot. Nothing here is a listing, a ranking or a feed of projects.

The method is narrow on purpose. Figures come from the operator’s published terms, then every one that the contract also exposes is read from the contract and compared. Where the two disagree, the contract is what gets published, and the disagreement is written down rather than quietly resolved.

The same applies to our own mistakes. A claim that turns out to be wrong is corrected on every page that carries it, and the correction says what was wrong rather than silently editing the sentence.

What that has produced so far

Four findings from reading the verified source against the published material. Each one is checkable without taking our word for it.

  1. 01

    Plan yield is not claimable while a cycle runs, which contradicts the usual description of a daily payout.

    The contract credits the principal and the full ROI to the claimable balance only at maturity; before that the accrual sits inside the position.

  2. 02

    The onboarding bonus is not in the contract, although it is described as generated by the protocol.

    There is no bonus function, no tier constants and no event. The first-deposit branch only updates team counters.

  3. 03

    The 6% fee does not reduce your payout, which is how a fee of that size is normally read.

    Both fees are withdrawn from the liquidity pool to a constant fee wallet, while the position is recorded at the full amount and the ROI is credited in full.

  4. 04

    The published plan terms, referral levels and rank requirements match the contract exactly.

    getPlanInfo, levelRequirements and getRankInfo return the same figures. The plan comparison on the homepage re-reads them at every build.

Two of those four corrected this site’s own earlier wording, not just the operator’s.

What this site is not

The limits matter more than the capabilities on a page about money.

  • Not investment advice, and not a recommendation to deposit. Nothing here accounts for your situation.
  • Not an audit. Reading a contract is not the same as auditing it, and we publish what the auditors found rather than a verdict of our own.
  • Not affiliated with the operator. We have no access to its books, its treasury or its plans, and nothing here is approved by it.
  • Not a record of money deposited and returned. This is an analysis of stated terms and chain data, not a report of our own results.
  • Not able to tell you whether the rate is sustainable. No contract exposes that figure, and nobody who claims otherwise has read one.

Who is behind it

The site publishes under its own name, and that choice has a cost worth stating.

There is no byline here. The pages are written and checked editorially, and nothing is signed with a name, a photograph or a list of credentials, which means you cannot weigh this site by who wrote it.

So weigh it by what it can be held to instead. Every figure names the source it came from, every contract claim names the function that returns it, and the explorer links sit next to the claim rather than at the bottom of the page. A reader with a wallet and ten minutes can reproduce the lot.

That is also the standard applied to the protocol on these pages: a claim is worth what its evidence is worth, and an impressive signature changes neither side of that.

Corrections

The pages that explain the rest